Gliklad v. Cherney
60 N.E.3d 416, 28 N.Y.3d 952, 38 N.Y.S.3d 521, 2016 NY Slip Op 85612, 2016 WL 4921621, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 2814
This text of 60 N.E.3d 416 (Gliklad v. Cherney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gliklad v. Cherney, 60 N.E.3d 416, 28 N.Y.3d 952, 38 N.Y.S.3d 521, 2016 NY Slip Op 85612, 2016 WL 4921621, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 2814 (N.Y. 2016).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Burke v Crosson, 85 NY2d 10, 18 n 5 [1995]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Burke v. Crosson
647 N.E.2d 736 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
60 N.E.3d 416, 28 N.Y.3d 952, 38 N.Y.S.3d 521, 2016 NY Slip Op 85612, 2016 WL 4921621, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 2814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gliklad-v-cherney-ny-2016.