Glide v. City of Sacramento

California Supreme Court

Glide v. City of Sacramento

269 P. 169, 204 Cal. 702

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 11, 1928

DocketDocket No. Sac. 3995.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 P. 169 (Glide v. City of Sacramento) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glide v. City of Sacramento, 269 P. 169, 204 Cal. 702 (Cal. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The order granting defendant's motion for a change of venue in this action is affirmed on the authority of Finance & Construction Co. of California v. City of Sacramento, ante, p. 491 [269 Pac. 167]. The only difference in the two cases is that in this case the plaintiff is a private person, while in case No. 3996 the plaintiff is a corporation. This difference is not material to any question involved herein.

Hearing in Bank denied.

All the Justices present concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The order granting defendant's motion for a change of venue in this action is affirmed on the authority of Finance & Construction Co. of California v. City of Sacramento, ante, p. 491 [269 Pac. 167]. The only difference in the two cases is that in this case the plaintiff is a private person, while in case No. 3996 the plaintiff is a corporation. This difference is not material to any question involved herein.

Hearing in Bank denied.

All the Justices present concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 P. 169, 204 Cal. 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glide-v-city-of-sacramento-cal-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack