Glide v. City of Sacramento
269 P. 169, 204 Cal. 702
Opinion
The order granting defendant's motion for a change of venue in this action is affirmed on the authority of Finance & Construction Co. of California v. City of Sacramento, ante, p. 491 [269 Pac. 167]. The only difference in the two cases is that in this case the plaintiff is a private person, while in case No. 3996 the plaintiff is a corporation. This difference is not material to any question involved herein.
Hearing in Bank denied.
All the Justices present concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Glide v. City of Sacramento, 269 P. 169, 204 Cal. 702 (Cal. 1928).
269 P. 169 (Glide v. City of Sacramento) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arcularius v. City of Los Angeles
75 P.2d 76 (California Court of Appeal, 1938)