Glidden v. Leonard

4 Port. 194
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1836·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

— A sci. fa. against bail need not state the affidavit and order for holding to bail: the proceeding according to the English forms is all sufficient.

All irregularities, as to taking bail, may be taken advantage of, on motion, at. the return term. Whe-. ther it can afterwards, is questionable.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glidden v. Leonard, 4 Port. 194 (Ala. 1836).

4 Port. 194 (Glidden v. Leonard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frazer v. Brownrigg
10 Ala. 817 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1846)