Glidden v. Leonard
4 Port. 194
This text of 4 Port. 194 (Glidden v. Leonard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Glidden v. Leonard, 4 Port. 194 (Ala. 1836).
Opinion
— A sci. fa. against bail need not state the affidavit and order for holding to bail: the proceeding according to the English forms is all sufficient.
All irregularities, as to taking bail, may be taken advantage of, on motion, at. the return term. Whe-. ther it can afterwards, is questionable.
The judgment must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Frazer v. Brownrigg
10 Ala. 817 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1846)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Port. 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glidden-v-leonard-ala-1836.