Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co.

828 N.E.2d 115, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1559
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 25, 2005·No. 2005-0293·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 81782, 2004-Ohio-6922. Discretionary appeal accepted.

Resnick, O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

On motion for admission pro hac vice of H. Christopher Bartolomucci by Kevin M. Young; motion for admission pro hac vice of John B. Haarlow, Michael P. Comiskey and Daniel S. Lambert by Dennis J. Bartek; motion for admission pro hac vice of Judith Fornie Helms by Holly Marie Wilson; motion for admission pro hac vice of Brian A. Frankl by David J. Fagnilli; motion for admission pro hac vice of William G. Passannante and Cathleen Cinella Tylis by Drew A. Carson; and motion for admission pro hac vice of Laura A. Foggan and John C. Yang by Stephen F. Gladstone. Motions granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 828 N.E.2d 115, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1559 (Ohio 2005).

828 N.E.2d 115 (Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related