Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Glickman v. State

Glickman v. State

696 So. 2d 1369, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8618, 1997 WL 423137
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 30, 1997
DocketNo. 96-3617
StatusPublished

This text of 696 So. 2d 1369 (Glickman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glickman v. State, 696 So. 2d 1369, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8618, 1997 WL 423137 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes that the trial court arrested Appellant’s conviction for indecent assault in open court following the jury’s verdict of guilt. The trial court, however, failed to conform its written sentence to its oral pronouncement. Therefore, we reverse Appellant’s sentence to the extent that it reflects a conviction for indecent assault and remand for the trial court to conform its written sentence to its oral pronouncement. See Kord v. State, 508 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kord v. State
508 So. 2d 758 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
696 So. 2d 1369, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8618, 1997 WL 423137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glickman-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.