Glickman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Glickman v. State

696 So. 2d 1369, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8618, 1997 WL 423137

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 30, 1997·No. No. 96-3617·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes that the trial court arrested Appellant’s conviction for indecent assault in open court following the jury’s verdict of guilt. The trial court, however, failed to conform its written sentence to its oral pronouncement. Therefore, we reverse Appellant’s sentence to the extent that it reflects a conviction for indecent assault and remand for the trial court to conform its written sentence to its oral pronouncement. See Kord v. State, 508 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes that the trial court arrested Appellant’s conviction for indecent assault in open court following the jury’s verdict of guilt. The trial court, however, failed to conform its written sentence to its oral pronouncement. Therefore, we reverse Appellant’s sentence to the extent that it reflects a conviction for indecent assault and remand for the trial court to conform its written sentence to its oral pronouncement. See Kord v. State, 508 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Glickman v. State, 696 So. 2d 1369, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8618, 1997 WL 423137 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

696 So. 2d 1369 (Glickman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related