Glickman v. New York Life Insurance

265 A.D. 882, 38 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6311

Opinion

Under these circumstances, the contract never had a valid inception. (Goldman v. New York Life Ins. Co., 152 Misc. Rep. 289; affd., without opinion, 242 App. Div. 665; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Watkin, 229 App. Div. 211; [First Department], affd. without opinion, 256 N. Y. 618; Polachek v. New York Life Ins. Co., 151 Misc. Rep. 172; affd. without opinion, 243 App. Div. 692; leave to appeal denied, 267 N. Y. xxxix.) The breach of warranty was material as it deprived the insurer of an opportunity to determine whether to accept or reject the application. (Geer v. Union Mutual Life Ins. Co., 273 N. Y. 261.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glickman v. New York Life Insurance, 265 A.D. 882, 38 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6311 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

265 A.D. 882 (Glickman v. New York Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Geer v. Union Mutual Life Insurance
7 N.E.2d 125 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)
New York Life Insurance Company v. Watkin
177 N.E. 164 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)
New York Life Insurance v. Watkin
229 A.D. 211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
Goldman v. New York Life Insurance
242 A.D. 665 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Polachek v. New York Life Insurance
243 A.D. 692 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
Polachek v. New York Life Insurance
151 Misc. 172 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)
Goldman v. New York Life Insurance
152 Misc. 289 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)