Glickman v. Kasha
23 A.D.2d 846, 259 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4061
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 25, 1965
StatusPublished
This text of 23 A.D.2d 846 (Glickman v. Kasha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Glickman v. Kasha, 23 A.D.2d 846, 259 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4061 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).
Opinion
Judgment in favor of plaintiffs affirmed, with $50 costs to respondents. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.; Steuer, J.,. dissents upon the ground that the evidence is insufficient to establish that the dramatization rights were available and does establish that the agreement in suit was conditioned upon their being available
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 A.D.2d 846, 259 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glickman-v-kasha-nyappdiv-1965.