Glick v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.

259 A.D. 1044, 20 N.Y.S.2d 933, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7905
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 1940·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff-wife, who claims to have been thrown to the floor of a subway car in which she was a passenger, due to a sudden and violent jerk of the train, and by the executrix of the estate of the injured woman’s husband for loss of services and medical expenses, judgment in favor of plaintiffs reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The trial court erred in charging the jury, under the circumstances of this case, that defendant had the duty to exercise the highest degree of care and caution in the operation of its train that human skill and prudence could suggest. (Stierle v. Union Railway Co., 156 N. Y. 70; Id. 684; Brennan v. Brooklyn & Queens T. Corp., 258 App. Div. 1055.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glick v. New York Rapid Transit Corp., 259 A.D. 1044, 20 N.Y.S.2d 933, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 1044 (Glick v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.
6 A.D.2d 649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Pickert v. Rochester Transit Corp.
274 A.D. 1088 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Barbato v. Vollmer
273 A.D. 169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Schulz v. Finn
273 A.D. 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)