Glick v. Lieb

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Glick v. Lieb

183 Misc. 869, 53 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1944 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2800

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1944

StatusPublished

This text of 183 Misc. 869 (Glick v. Lieb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glick v. Lieb, 183 Misc. 869, 53 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1944 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum

Per Curiam.

Assuming that respondent Lieb may be deemed to have signed the note on its face otherwise than as a maker, within the meaning of section 113 of the Negotiable Instruments Law, that provision of the statute does not conclusively establish that he is in fact an indorser; and it was error to exclude evidence to show he was a comaker.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI