GLICK FINLEY, LLC v. Glick

254 S.W.3d 105, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 336, 2008 WL 708499

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Karen I. Finley (hereinafter, “Finley”) and Glick Finley, LLC (hereinafter, “the Firm” and collectively as “Appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment granting Thomas G. Glick’s (hereinafter, “Glick”) counterclaim/cross-claim requesting the involuntary dissolution of the Firm and the appointment of a receiver. Appellants raise three points on appeal.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and transcript on appeal. We find no error. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).