Glicenstein v. Fust

19 A.D.2d 841, 244 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3069
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 28, 1963·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for injury to property, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 20, 1963, which (1) granted plaintiffs application to vacate a prior order of said court dismissing the action and to restore it to the General Calendar; and (2) directed the Calendar Clerk to restore the action to its regular place on the calendar. Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appellants have failed to submit a proper record as required by statute and rule (former Civ. Prae. Act, § 616; Rules Civ. Prae., rule 234; Whipple v. Bipson, 29 App. Div. 70; Matter of Gowdey, 101 App. Div. 275; Levine v. Garr, 11 A D 2d 721; Bennett Excavators Corp. v. Lasker-Goldman Corp., 11 A D 2d 734). Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glicenstein v. Fust, 19 A.D.2d 841, 244 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3069 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

19 A.D.2d 841 (Glicenstein v. Fust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKenzie v. Damazio
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017