GLETZER v. Harris

Missouri Court of Appeals

GLETZER v. Harris

357 S.W.3d 609, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 113, 2012 WL 273723

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 31, 2012·No. ED 95304·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Amos Brady Harris (“Harris”) and real estate development company Brady Capital, Inc. (“Brady Capital”) ap *610 peal from the circuit court’s judgment granting a creditor’s bill in favor of Plaintiff Maurice Gletzer (“Gletzer”) on his petition to satisfy a judgment against Harris from 1991. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Amos Brady Harris (“Harris”) and real estate development company Brady Capital, Inc. (“Brady Capital”) ap *610 peal from the circuit court’s judgment granting a creditor’s bill in favor of Plaintiff Maurice Gletzer (“Gletzer”) on his petition to satisfy a judgment against Harris from 1991. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

GLETZER v. Harris, 357 S.W.3d 609, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 113, 2012 WL 273723 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

357 S.W.3d 609 (GLETZER v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.