Glettner v. Blauner

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Glettner v. Blauner

85 N.Y.S. 374

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 30, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 85 N.Y.S. 374 (Glettner v. Blauner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glettner v. Blauner, 85 N.Y.S. 374 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

BLANCHARD, J.

The plaintiff alleges that the defendant has collected money belonging to her, and refuses to pay it over. She testifies that she loaned the money to a third party at the request of the defendant, and upon his promise to b.e responsible for its repay[375]*375ment; that he thereafter collected $i io of the debt, and has paid her $20 of this sum, and now owes her the balance, $90; that after he collected the money the defendant promised several times to pay it over, but that the balance of $90 is still unpaid. This testimony is corroborated by several witnesses. The defendant testified that he had not collected any of the money, and that he never promised to pay it, or to be responsible for its payment. The evidence presents only a question of fact, and this the trial court has properly disposed of.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. AM concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLANCHARD, J.

The plaintiff alleges that the defendant has collected money belonging to her, and refuses to pay it over. She testifies that she loaned the money to a third party at the request of the defendant, and upon his promise to b.e responsible for its repay[375]*375ment; that he thereafter collected $i io of the debt, and has paid her $20 of this sum, and now owes her the balance, $90; that after he collected the money the defendant promised several times to pay it over, but that the balance of $90 is still unpaid. This testimony is corroborated by several witnesses. The defendant testified that he had not collected any of the money, and that he never promised to pay it, or to be responsible for its payment. The evidence presents only a question of fact, and this the trial court has properly disposed of.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. AM concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 N.Y.S. 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glettner-v-blauner-nyappterm-1903.