Glentworth v. Hutchinson
11 N.J.L. 91
This text of 11 N.J.L. 91 (Glentworth v. Hutchinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Glentworth v. Hutchinson, 11 N.J.L. 91 (N.J. 1829).
Opinion
We think the bond is sufficient. It is-sufficient to identify the case from which he meant to appeal.. The names of the parties, and the amount of the judgment, are 'correctly recited. These are sufficient to identify the judgment, and the style of the action is not necessary to'be-stated.
Mandamus allowed..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Busik v. Levine
307 A.2d 571 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1973)
Cohrs v. IGOE BROTHERS, INC.
169 A.2d 524 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 N.J.L. 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glentworth-v-hutchinson-nj-1829.