Glentworth v. Hutchinson
11 N.J.L. 91
Opinion
We think the bond is sufficient. It is-sufficient to identify the case from which he meant to appeal.. The names of the parties, and the amount of the judgment, are 'correctly recited. These are sufficient to identify the judgment, and the style of the action is not necessary to'be-stated.
Mandamus allowed..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Glentworth v. Hutchinson, 11 N.J.L. 91 (N.J. 1829).
11 N.J.L. 91 (Glentworth v. Hutchinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Busik v. Levine
307 A.2d 571 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1973)
Cohrs v. IGOE BROTHERS, INC.
169 A.2d 524 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)