Glenny v. Warden
This text of 514 P.2d 1 (Glenny v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of ex-felon in possession of a firearm, a violation of NRS 202.360. On this appeal from the denial of a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus, he challenges his custodial interrogation, fingerprinting and the constitutionality of NRS 202.360.
We have chosen not to appoint counsel in this proper person appeal or require any briefing of the issues raised as the appeal is without merit.
Since the appellant pleaded guilty to the charge and there is no indication in the record that the plea was either involuntary or made without assistance of counsel, collateral attack of the conviction is precluded. Any errors are superseded by the plea of guilty. Hall v. Warden, 83 Nev. 446, 434 P.2d 425 (1967); Powell v. Sheriff, 85 Nev. 684, 462 P.2d 756 (1969); Mathis v. Warden, 86 Nev. 439, 471 P.2d 233 (1970).
We have previously considered and rejected a challenge to the constitutionality of NRS 202.360. Hardison v. State, 84 Nev. 125, 437 P.2d 868 (1968).
The order of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
514 P.2d 1, 89 Nev. 396, 1973 Nev. LEXIS 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glenny-v-warden-nev-1973.