Glennerster v. Zorns Poultry Farms

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glennerster v. Zorns Poultry Farms

81 A.D.2d 607, 440 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11096

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 81 A.D.2d 607 (Glennerster v. Zorns Poultry Farms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glennerster v. Zorns Poultry Farms, 81 A.D.2d 607, 440 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a personal injury action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 20, 1979, which granted plaintiff’s motion to compel defendant to accept service of a summons and complaint in a Supreme Court action. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. While it is clear that defendant should be estopped from claiming that the Civil Court action should be dismissed due to lack of personal jurisdiction, nevertheless, plaintiff failed to establish that the acts of defendant, through its insurance carrier, should estop it from claiming that the Civil Court action was not transferred to the Supreme Court. Hopkins, J.P., Titone, Rabin and Hargett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a personal injury action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 20, 1979, which granted plaintiff’s motion to compel defendant to accept service of a summons and complaint in a Supreme Court action. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. While it is clear that defendant should be estopped from claiming that the Civil Court action should be dismissed due to lack of personal jurisdiction, nevertheless, plaintiff failed to establish that the acts of defendant, through its insurance carrier, should estop it from claiming that the Civil Court action was not transferred to the Supreme Court. Hopkins, J.P., Titone, Rabin and Hargett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 607, 440 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glennerster-v-zorns-poultry-farms-nyappdiv-1981.