Glennerster v. Conley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glennerster v. Conley

202 A.D.2d 551, 610 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2657

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 202 A.D.2d 551 (Glennerster v. Conley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glennerster v. Conley, 202 A.D.2d 551, 610 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Laura Feinstein appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated March 31, 1992, which granted the motions of the defendants A. Byszkiewicz and Carolee Conley to dismiss the complaint based on the plaintiffs failure to establish that she had sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff has failed to raise any triable issues of fact with regard to whether she sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Laura Feinstein appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated March 31, 1992, which granted the motions of the defendants A. Byszkiewicz and Carolee Conley to dismiss the complaint based on the plaintiffs failure to establish that she had sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff has failed to raise any triable issues of fact with regard to whether she sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D.2d 551, 610 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glennerster-v-conley-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack