Glenn Waite v. Douglas DeLair

334 F. App'x 791
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2009·No. 08-3571·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Glenn Waite appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion for declaratory relief. Upon careful review of the record, see Frulla v. CRA Holdings Inc., 543 F.3d 1247, 1251 (11th Cir.2008) (standard of review), including Waite’s prior unsuccessful appeal, see Waite v. DeLair, 3 Fed.Appx. 574 (8th Cir.2001) (unpublished per curiam), we conclude that the instant appeal is governed by the law-of-the-case doctrine, see Jones v. United States, 255 F.3d 507, 510 (8th Cir.2001) (all issues decided by appellate court become law of the case; this rule extends not only to actual holdings but also to all issues implicitly settled in prior holdings); United States v. Bartsh, 69 F.3d 864, 866 (8th Cir.1995) (law-of-the-case doctrine prevents relitigation of settled issue in case and requires courts to adhere to decisions made in earlier proceedings). Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glenn Waite v. Douglas DeLair, 334 F. App'x 791 (8th Cir. 2009).

334 F. App'x 791 (Glenn Waite v. Douglas DeLair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frulla v. CRA Holdings, Inc.
543 F.3d 1247 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Thomas Chisolm Bartsh
69 F.3d 864 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
Waite v. Delair
3 F. App'x 574 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)