Glenn v. Tessema

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 7, 2009
• Docket: 09-6922
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6922

KAIMEL GLENN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ISAH TESSEMA, Doctor,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-02304-WDQ)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 7, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kaimel Glenn, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kaimel Glenn appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Glenn v. Tessema, No. 1:08-cv-02304-WDQ (D. Md. Mar. 19,

2009). We deny Glenn’s numerous pending motions: for

appointment of counsel, for $150,000 in punitive damages and the

removal of Dr. Isah Tessema, for $50,000 in punitive damages and

the removal of Nurse Barnhart, for $75,000 in damages and the

removal of April Baker, and for $250,000 in punitive damages

from CMS, a private contractor of medical services. We deny as

moot Glenn’s motions for summary judgment and injunctive relief

pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED