Glenn v. State, Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Dentistry

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Glenn v. State, Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Dentistry

444 So. 2d 1000, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11330

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 10, 1984

DocketNo. 82-1486

StatusPublished

This text of 444 So. 2d 1000 (Glenn v. State, Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Dentistry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glenn v. State, Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Dentistry, 444 So. 2d 1000, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11330 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Based on an exception contained in Florida Real Estate Commission v. Webb, 367 So.2d 201 (Fla.1978), we reversed the penalty imposed on appellant and remanded for reconsideration. Glenn v. Department of Professional Regulation, 410 So.2d 935 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). When the matter came before the board, four members thereof recused themselves. This reduced the normal composition of the board from nine to five. The board imposed a penalty of $1,000 and a four-month suspension. Glenn appeals contending that the board departed from statutory proceedings. Specifically, Glenn claims that it should have replaced the recused members of the board so as to maintain the statutory composition. We disagree.

Section 466.004, Florida Statutes (1981) provides that the board shall consist of nine members, and that six shall be licensed dentists actively engaged in the practice of dentistry. Section 455.207(3), Florida Statutes (1981) provides that business of a board must be conducted by a quorum and that a quorum is fifty-one per cent or more of the members of the board. These are the only statutory requirements for the composition of the board. Since they have been satisfied, we must reject appellant’s contention on this point.

Finding the other arguments to be without merit, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based on an exception contained in Florida Real Estate Commission v. Webb, 367 So.2d 201 (Fla.1978), we reversed the penalty imposed on appellant and remanded for reconsideration. Glenn v. Department of Professional Regulation, 410 So.2d 935 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). When the matter came before the board, four members thereof recused themselves. This reduced the normal composition of the board from nine to five. The board imposed a penalty of $1,000 and a four-month suspension. Glenn appeals contending that the board departed from statutory proceedings. Specifically, Glenn claims that it should have replaced the recused members of the board so as to maintain the statutory composition. We disagree.

Section 466.004, Florida Statutes (1981) provides that the board shall consist of nine members, and that six shall be licensed dentists actively engaged in the practice of dentistry. Section 455.207(3), Florida Statutes (1981) provides that business of a board must be conducted by a quorum and that a quorum is fifty-one per cent or more of the members of the board. These are the only statutory requirements for the composition of the board. Since they have been satisfied, we must reject appellant’s contention on this point.

Finding the other arguments to be without merit, we affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

444 So. 2d 1000, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glenn-v-state-department-of-professional-regulation-board-of-dentistry-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack