Glenn v. Pruet

82 So. 556, 17 Ala. App. 108, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 126
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 18, 1919
Docket7 Div. 511.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 82 So. 556 (Glenn v. Pruet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glenn v. Pruet, 82 So. 556, 17 Ala. App. 108, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 126 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinions

The record in this case, as pertains to the bill of exceptions, has been mutilated, and has the appearance of having been so mutilated and changed after its preparation and certification by the clerk of the court, and the transcript as presented has not been prepared in conformity with Supreme Court rule 26 (61 South. vii1), Code of 1907, p. 1512. Under former rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, the record might well be stricken and the cause dismissed, but in order that no injustice be done and that the appellant may acquit himself of fault, the order of submission will be set aside, the cause restored to the docket, and a citation issue to the appellant, or his attorney of record, to show cause why the bill of exceptions should not be stricken.

Let the submission be set aside and the cause restored to the docket and a citation issue to the parties, or their attorneys of record, as above indicated.

1 175 Ala. xix.

On Final Hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Dawkins
104 So. 2d 827 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Mauney v. Electric Const. Co.
98 So. 874 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 So. 556, 17 Ala. App. 108, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glenn-v-pruet-alactapp-1919.