Glenn v. Layton

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 3, 2011·No. 10-7755·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7755

KAIMEL L. GLENN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

E. LAYTON, CO, II,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:10-cv-03430-WDQ)

Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 3, 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kaimel L. Glenn, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kaimel L. Glenn appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Glenn v. Layton, No. 1:10-cv-03430-WDQ (D. Md. Dec. 14,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glenn v. Layton, (4th Cir. 2011).

Glenn v. Layton (Glenn v. Layton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related