Glenn v. Gibson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Glenn v. Gibson

206 So. 2d 229

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 12, 1967

DocketNo. 66-852

StatusPublished

This text of 206 So. 2d 229 (Glenn v. Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glenn v. Gibson, 206 So. 2d 229 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was the defendant in a negligence action wherein plaintiffs charged defendant with negligently causing an automobile collision that injured plaintiffs. Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict.

It is appellant’s contention that there was insufficient evidence to take the case to the jury and that the court should have directed a verdict in favor of the appellant. We find no merit in this contention.

The record on appeal indicates that there was sufficient evidence to create a jury issue and the court was correct in denying the motion for directed verdict. It is our view that the jury verdict should not be disturbed as no error has been clearly made to appear. Therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. See Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Gary, Fla.1951, 57 So.2d 10; Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. Larkins, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 408; Sears, Roebuck & Company v. Sheppard, Fla.App.1967, 194 So.2d 62.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was the defendant in a negligence action wherein plaintiffs charged defendant with negligently causing an automobile collision that injured plaintiffs. Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict.

It is appellant’s contention that there was insufficient evidence to take the case to the jury and that the court should have directed a verdict in favor of the appellant. We find no merit in this contention.

The record on appeal indicates that there was sufficient evidence to create a jury issue and the court was correct in denying the motion for directed verdict. It is our view that the jury verdict should not be disturbed as no error has been clearly made to appear. Therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. See Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Gary, Fla.1951, 57 So.2d 10; Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. Larkins, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 408; Sears, Roebuck & Company v. Sheppard, Fla.App.1967, 194 So.2d 62.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 So. 2d 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glenn-v-gibson-fladistctapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack