Glenn v. Farmers' Bank of North Carolina

72 N.C. 626
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 72 N.C. 626 (Glenn v. Farmers' Bank of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glenn v. Farmers' Bank of North Carolina, 72 N.C. 626 (N.C. 1875).

Opinion

PeaesoN, O. J.

The plaintiffs’ action is very complicated, both in respect to parties plaintiffs and parties defendants, and also in regard to the causes of action against the bank, and the causes of action against the stockholders. It remains to be seen whether he will be able to surmount all of the difficulties that lie in his way, so as to reach the stockholders individually.

*628 The charter makes the stockholders individually liable, in case of the insolvency of the bank. So assuming, as is admitted by the demurrer, that the bank is insolvent, the plaintiff has a good cause of action, whereby to make the stockholders Individually liable; and the question is, how must the plaintiff proceed, to subject the stockholders? It would be a reproach to the administration of justice, if the plaintiff has no ■mode of enforcing his right, and we will be reluctant to make an exception to the maxim, there is “ no right without a .remedy.'” Wo incline to the opinion that the very liberal mode of procedure adopted by C. C. P., in the sections referred to in the plaintiff’s brief, meets the difficulties raised by the demurrer, and without deciding the points definitely, but allowing the defendants to have the benefit thereof at the trial, in analogy to the equity practice, by which the plea is overruled, but “ the equity is reserved until the hearing,” we have come to the conclusion, that there is no error in the judgment of his Honor, by which the demurrer is overruled and the defendants .are required to answer.

This opinion will be certified.

Pbxí CueiaM. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee v. . Thornton
88 S.E. 232 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)
Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Floyd
74 S.E. 465 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912)
Oldham v. . Rieger
58 S.E. 1091 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1907)
Fisher v. . Trust Co.
50 S.E. 659 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)
Outland v. . Outland
18 S.E. 72 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1893)
Foster v. . Hackett
17 S.E. 426 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1893)
Bronson v. Wilmington N. C. Life Insurance
85 N.C. 411 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1881)
Dawson Bank v. Harris
84 N.C. 206 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1881)
York v. . Landis
65 N.C. 535 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 N.C. 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glenn-v-farmers-bank-of-north-carolina-nc-1875.