Glenn v. Botts

9 S.E. 425, 79 Ga. 212, 1887 Ga. LEXIS 205
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 13, 1887·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

After argument of these cases and before any decision was delivered, counsel for plaintiff in error moved to withdraw the bills of exceptions, on the ground that each case had been settled. In support of the motion, he presented the written agreements of counsel of record for defendants in error, stating that a settlement had been agreed upon, and consenting that the cases might be withdrawn. On the hearing, other counsel who had been heard on the argument, not representing the original parties but others who were interested in the decision, objected to the withdrawal, and cited the case in 41 Ga° 523. The motion to withdraw was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glenn v. Botts, 9 S.E. 425, 79 Ga. 212, 1887 Ga. LEXIS 205 (Ga. 1887).

9 S.E. 425 (Glenn v. Botts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In The Matter Of Jane G. Clifford
566 F.2d 1023 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
Ivey v. Transouth Financial Corp.
566 F.2d 1023 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
Fain v. Commercial Credit Co.
169 S.E. 781 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Lankford v. Peterson
93 S.E. 499 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Bacon v. Hanesley
90 S.E. 1033 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Wynn & Robinson v. Tyner
78 S.E. 185 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Powers & Co. v. Georgia-Florida Grocery Co.
67 S.E. 685 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Mizell Live Stock Co. v. J. J. McCaskill Co.
59 Fla. 322 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1910)
Clarke Bros. v. McNatt
26 L.R.A.N.S. 585 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
McNelis v. State
61 S.E. 842 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)