Glenn v. Baker

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 27, 2009·No. 09-7299·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7299

KAIMEL GLENN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

APRIL BAKER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-00388-WDQ)

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 27, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kaimel Glenn, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Mary Beth Ewen, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kaimel Glenn appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Glenn v. Baker, No. 1:09-cv-00388-WDQ (D. Md. filed June

4, 2009 & entered June 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glenn v. Baker, (4th Cir. 2009).

Glenn v. Baker (Glenn v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related