Glenn Louis Baker v. State
Opinion
Order entered June 5, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01352-CR
GLENN LOUIS BAKER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416-82158-2014
ORDER Appellant, who was convicted of indecency with a child by sexual contact, filed a brief
on May 20, 2019. In the brief, appellant uses the names of the child victim, certain child
witnesses, and other children. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b) (“Unless a court orders otherwise, an
electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not
contain sensitive data.”), id. 9.10(a)(3) (“Sensitive Data Defined. Sensitive data consists of: (1) a
driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax identification number or
similar government-issued personal identification number; (2) bank account number, credit card
number, and other financial account number; (3) a birth date, a home address, and the name of
any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.”). Accordingly, we STRIKE the brief filed in contravention of counsel’s certification that the brief complied with
rule 9.10(a) and (b). See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(e).
We ORDER appellant to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, an amended
brief that identifies the child victim and any other child (including witnesses) either generically
(for example, “victim” or “victim’s younger sister”) or by initials only. See TEX. R. APP. P.
9.10(d).
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to David L. Botsford and the Collin
County District Attorney’s Office.
/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Glenn Louis Baker v. State (Glenn Louis Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.