Glenn, Ex Parte Dustin Wayne

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 31, 2015
DocketPD-0353-15
StatusPublished

This text of Glenn, Ex Parte Dustin Wayne (Glenn, Ex Parte Dustin Wayne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glenn, Ex Parte Dustin Wayne, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PD-0350-15, PD-0351-15, PD-0352-15 & PD-0353-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 3/30/2015 12:00:00 AM March 31, 2015 Accepted 3/31/2015 3:11:48 PM ABEL ACOSTA PD._________________ CLERK

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS

DUSTIN WAYNE GLENN Appeals No. 01-13-00640-CR Appeals No. 01-13-00641-CR V. Appeals No. 01-14-00042-CR Appeals No. 04-14-00195-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

COMES NOW, David Suhler, counsel for DUSTIN WAYNE GLENN, and files

this motion asking that the Court extend the time for filing the Appellant’s petition for

discretionary review, and in support thereof, offers the following:

I.

a. This case is on appeal from the 405th District Court and the County Court-at-

Law Number Three of Galveston County, Texas.

b. The style and number of the cases in the District Court are The State of Texas

v. Dustin Wayne Glenn, Cause Numbers 12CR2237 and 12CR2238 and in the

County Court-at-Law Number Three are Dustin Wayne Glenn v. The State of

Texas Cause Numbers CV-0070368 and CV-0070369.

c. The Appellant was convicted by the 405th District Court after adjudicating

Appellant guilty of the offenses of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in

both the felony charges and Appellant's writs of habeas corpus were denied in the County Court-at-Law Number Three for convictions of the offenses of

criminal trespass and resisting arrest, respectively.

d. Punishment was assessed by the 405th District Court at twelve (12) years

confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice – Institutional

Division in both causes to run concurrently and by the County Court-at-Law

Number Three at fifteen (15) days in jail in both causes to run concurrently.

e. The style and number of the cases in the First Court of Appeals are Dustin

Wayne Glenn v. State of Texas, Appeal Numbers 01-13-00640-CR, 01-13-

00641-CR, 01-14-00042 & 01-14-00195-CR.

f. The First Court of Appeals affirmed Appellant’s convictions and sentence in

the appeal of the felonies in an unpublished opinion on February 26, 2015 and

the denial of Appellant's relief in the writs of habeas corpus also on February

26, 2015.

g. The present deadline for filing the Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary

Review is March 28, 2015, a Saturday, therefore the actual deadline is March

30, 2015.

h. The Appellant seeks an extension of time of 30 days, suggesting a new due

date of April 30, 2015.

i. This is the Appellant’s first request for an extension of time to file the

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

II.

This extension is not sought for the purpose of delaying this appeal, but relies on the following facts to reasonably explain the need for an extension:

1. Counsel for Appellant is currently completing briefing in other cases,

causing a delay to adequately research and brief the referred cases by the

deadline. Within one (1) week of the opinion from the First Court of

Appeals, that court issued its rulings in another case for which PDR will

also be sought. That matter has been on hold for over six (6) months while

the First Court of Appeals decided the motion for rehearing and

considerable time will be required for counsel to become familiar with the

issues again.

2. Counsel for Appellant recently experienced a hung jury in a District Court

case and now must re-prepare for trial in that matter.

III.

A criminal appellant, just like a criminal defendant at trial, is entitled to the

adequate and effective assistance of counsel. Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 396 (1985);

Ward v. State, 740 S.W. 2d 794 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987). In order to be able to accurately

identify and effectively brief all the potential issues presented in this case, counsel for

Appellant needs additional time to review the record and conduct the necessary research

to adequately prepare Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review. This request is

made pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2 (c).

IV.

Therefore, for the above reasons, Counsel for Appellant prays that the Court grant an extension of time to April 30, 2015, for filing of the Appellant’s Petition for

Discretionary Review.

Respectfully submitted,

David Suhler___________ DAVID SUHLER Attorney for Defendant State Bar No. 19465900 P.O. Box 540744 Houston, Texas 77254-0744 (713) 522-1220

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true copy of the above motion was delivered by email to Ms.

Allison Lindblade with the Office of the Criminal District Attorney of Galveston County

TX on March 28, 2015.

David Suhler__________ DAVID SUHLER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evitts v. Lucey
469 U.S. 387 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Ward v. State
740 S.W.2d 794 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Glenn, Ex Parte Dustin Wayne, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glenn-ex-parte-dustin-wayne-texapp-2015.