Glenn Ervin Anders v. State

Opinion

NO. 07-11-00149-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

AUGUST 15, 2011

GLENN ERVIN ANDERS, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

 FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY;

NO. CR22898; HONORABLE EDWARD P. MAGRE, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ORDER

On August 1, 2011, and in response to counsel’s failure to comply with our earlier directive that he remedy identified errors related to his Anders[1] brief, we abated and remanded this cause to the trial court and directed that the trial court conduct a hearing on a variety of matters relating to counsel’s representation of appellant.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.6.  Within the week following our order abating and remanding the cause and prior to the trial court having held a hearing, we received a response from counsel in which he includes, as previously directed, a motion to withdraw, a corrected prayer for relief, and a supplemental educational burdens letter to his client.

            Finding that the documents submitted by counsel comply with applicable requirements of the Anders procedure and recognizing that the issues upon which the trial court was to hold a hearing are moot in light of this finding, we hereby reinstate the appeal with all deadlines running from the date of this order.

            IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                                                                 Per Curiam 

Do not publish. 

---

[1] Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 493 (1967).