Glenn Damond v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., TransUnion LLC, Equifax Information Services LLC, CSC Lawyers Incorporating Services

• Court: District Court, E.D. Louisiana
• Decided: January 9, 2026
• Docket: 2:25-cv-01570
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA GLENN DAMOND CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 25-1570 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, SECTION “O” INC., ET AL. ORDER AND REASONS Plaintiff Glenn Damond filed this pro se action against Experian Information

Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), TransUnion LLC (“TransUnion”), Equifax Information Services LLC (“Equifax”), and CSC Lawyers Incorporating Services (“CSC”) on July 30, 2025, asserting violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Lanham Act as well as state law claims seeking billions of dollars in damages and injunctive relief.1 On November 18, 2025, the Court referred2 several pending motions to Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault and referred3 an additional motion on

December 1, 2025. On December 12, 2025, Judge Currault issued a Report and Recommendation4 (“R&R”) recommending that the Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Equifax and TransUnion and adopted by Experian be granted in part; Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment as to CSC be denied; Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint be denied without prejudice; CSC’s motion to

1 See generally ECF No. 1 (Complaint). 2 See ECF No. 38 (referring ECF Nos. 13, 27, 29, 31, and 37). 3 See ECF No. 42 (referring ECF No. 39). 4 ECF No. 44. set aside default be granted; Plaintiff’s motion to strike be denied; and CSC’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) be granted. On December 18, 2025, Plaintiff Glenn Damond filed objections5 to Magistrate

Judge Currault’s R&R. The Court applies a de novo review to the parts of the R&R to which he objects. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); see also Hernandez v. Estelle, 711 F.2d 619, 620 (5th Cir. 1983) (holding that de novo determination requires “the district court to arrive at its own, independent conclusion about those portions of the magistrate’s report to which objection is made[, which] is not satisfied by a mere review of the magistrate’s report itself”). Any portion of the R&R to which Damond did not object is reviewed for clear error. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto.

Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996). Having conducted a thorough review of Plaintiff’s complaint, the briefing for all motions submitted by the parties, the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge’s R&R, and Plaintiff’s objections, the Court concludes the R&R should be adopted because Defendants’ objections to the R&R are without merit. The Court hereby approves the R&R and adopts it as its opinion in this matter.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ objections6 to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation7 is ADOPTED.

5 ECF No. 46. 6 ECF No. 46. 7 ECF No. 44. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Rule 12(b)(6) motion8 to dismiss filed by Defendants Equifax Information Services LLC, TransUnion LLC, and Experian Information Solutions, is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff’s Lanham Act

claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff’s FCRA claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with leave to amend within twenty- one days of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion9 for default judgment as to CSC Lawyers Incorporating Services is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion10 for leave to file amended complaint is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff’s right to

file an amended complaint as directed within 21 days. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that CSC Lawyers Incorporating Services’ motion11 to set aside default is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion12 to strike is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that CSC Lawyers Incorporating Services’

motion13 to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) is GRANTED and to 12(b)(6) is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

8 ECF No. 13. 9 ECF No. 27. 10 ECF No. 29. 11 ECF No. 31. 12 ECF No. 37. 13 ECF No. 39. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 9th day of January, 2026.

BRANDON S. LONG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE