Glenn Dale Ranches, Inc. v. Shaub

522 P.2d 61, 95 Idaho 853, 1974 Ida. LEXIS 525
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided May 10, 1974·No. 11219·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the district court wherein the court held appellant Norris Shaub in contempt for violating a permanent injunction which prohibited appellant from diverting more than 10 miners inches of water from the Mendini Tunnel.

An order holding a person in contempt is not an appealable order under I.C. § 7-614. In Barnett v. Reed, 93 Idaho 319, 460 P.2d 744 (1969), this Court stated:

“While the order holding a person in contempt is not appealable under I.C. § 7-614, the writ of review has. been recognized as a proper method by which the actions of a court in a contempt proceeding can be reviewed. Mathison v. Felton, 90 Idaho 87, 408 P.2d 457 (1965).” 93 Idaho at 321, 460 P.2d at 746.

Appellant may petition for a writ of review in accordance with the procedures set forth in I.C. § 7-201 et seq. See Dutton v. District Court of Third Judicial District, County of Owyhee, 95 Idaho 720, 518 P.2d 1182 (1974).

Appeal dismissed. No costs allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glenn Dale Ranches, Inc. v. Shaub, 522 P.2d 61, 95 Idaho 853, 1974 Ida. LEXIS 525 (Idaho 1974).

522 P.2d 61 (Glenn Dale Ranches, Inc. v. Shaub) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reeves v. Reynolds
733 P.2d 795 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1987)
In Re Contempt of Reeves
733 P.2d 795 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1987)
Marks v. Vehlow
671 P.2d 473 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. Talmage
658 P.2d 920 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1983)
Parker v. Parker
541 P.2d 1177 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1975)
Shaub v. District Court of the Fifth Judicial District
539 P.2d 277 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1975)