Glenn Blair v. Latosha Dionne Mitchell

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 11, 2022
Docket14-22-00626-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Glenn Blair v. Latosha Dionne Mitchell (Glenn Blair v. Latosha Dionne Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glenn Blair v. Latosha Dionne Mitchell, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 11, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00626-CV

GLENN BLAIR, Appellant

V. LATOSHA DIONNE MITCHELL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 310th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-04645

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a decree of divorce signed May 3, 2022. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial on May 3, 2022. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed August 19, 2022.

When appellant has filed a timely post-judgment motion, the notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days after the date the judgment is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, but within the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617–18 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the 15-day period provided by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3.

On September 13, 2022, notification was transmitted to all parties the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Glenn Blair v. Latosha Dionne Mitchell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glenn-blair-v-latosha-dionne-mitchell-texapp-2022.