Glendora v. Jacobs

Fourth Circuit

Glendora v. Jacobs

71 F. App'x 269

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 20, 2003·No. No. 03-1764·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Glendora appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Glendora v. Jacobs, No. CA-03-1166-MJG (D.Md. Apr. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Glendora appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Glendora v. Jacobs, No. CA-03-1166-MJG (D.Md. Apr. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Glendora v. Jacobs, 71 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

71 F. App'x 269 (Glendora v. Jacobs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.