Glendora v. Anderson
This text of 46 F. App'x 568 (Glendora v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Glendora appeals pro se the district court’s order denying reconsideration of its judgment dismissing for lack of venue Glendora’ action alleging that a cable television operator removed her program from several of its public access channels in communities around New York City. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Glendora’s motion for reconsideration. See Maraziti v. Thorpe, 52 F.3d 252, 253 (9th Cir.1995); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a).
Glendora’s remaining contentions lack merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 F. App'x 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glendora-v-anderson-ca9-2002.