Glendora v. Anderson

46 F. App'x 568
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 20, 2002·No. No. 02-15608; D.C. No. CV-01-01400-PMP·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Glendora appeals pro se the district court’s order denying reconsideration of its judgment dismissing for lack of venue Glendora’ action alleging that a cable television operator removed her program from several of its public access channels in communities around New York City. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Glendora’s motion for reconsideration. See Maraziti v. Thorpe, 52 F.3d 252, 253 (9th Cir.1995); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a).

Glendora’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glendora v. Anderson, 46 F. App'x 568 (9th Cir. 2002).

46 F. App'x 568 (Glendora v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glendora v. Sellers y
57 F. App'x 378 (Tenth Circuit, 2003)