GLENDALE MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. Bonano

Supreme Court of North Carolina

GLENDALE MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. Bonano

89 S.E.2d 115, 242 N.C. 590, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 616, 37 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2002

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 21, 1955

Docket96

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E.2d 115 (GLENDALE MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. Bonano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

GLENDALE MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. Bonano, 89 S.E.2d 115, 242 N.C. 590, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 616, 37 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2002 (N.C. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Following a labor dispute in plaintiff’s manufacturing plant, a number of the employees went out on strike, and these, with others, engaged in mass picketing and threats of violence and other means of intimidation to deter those employees who desired to continue their employment. Thereupon plaintiff instituted this action, and upon its verified complaint the court issued a restraining order restraining the defendants from certain specific unlawful acts. Thereafter upon affidavits filed alleging violation of the restraining order, order to show cause was issued, and after notice the court heard the evidence offered by plaintiff and defendants and found the facts. Upon the facts so found the court concluded that the defendants were guilty of contempt of court for willful disobedience of specified provisions of the restraining order, and imposed punishment therefor.

From an examination of the record and the evidence offered, it appears that the facts found by the court are supported by the evidence, and that the conclusions of law were properly predicated thereon. The *591 judgment holding the defendants in contempt of court for willful disobedience of a lawful order of the court will be upheld. G.S. 5-1 (4).

Judgment affirmed.

WiNBORNE and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Following a labor dispute in plaintiff’s manufacturing plant, a number of the employees went out on strike, and these, with others, engaged in mass picketing and threats of violence and other means of intimidation to deter those employees who desired to continue their employment. Thereupon plaintiff instituted this action, and upon its verified complaint the court issued a restraining order restraining the defendants from certain specific unlawful acts. Thereafter upon affidavits filed alleging violation of the restraining order, order to show cause was issued, and after notice the court heard the evidence offered by plaintiff and defendants and found the facts. Upon the facts so found the court concluded that the defendants were guilty of contempt of court for willful disobedience of specified provisions of the restraining order, and imposed punishment therefor.

From an examination of the record and the evidence offered, it appears that the facts found by the court are supported by the evidence, and that the conclusions of law were properly predicated thereon. The *591 judgment holding the defendants in contempt of court for willful disobedience of a lawful order of the court will be upheld. G.S. 5-1 (4).

Judgment affirmed.

WiNBORNE and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E.2d 115, 242 N.C. 590, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 616, 37 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glendale-manufacturing-company-v-bonano-nc-1955.