Glenda J. v. David C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glenda J. v. David C.

273 A.D.2d 947, 711 N.Y.S.2d 368, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6984

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 273 A.D.2d 947 (Glenda J. v. David C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glenda J. v. David C., 273 A.D.2d 947, 711 N.Y.S.2d 368, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6984 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Case held, decision reserved, motion to relieve counsel of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned. Memorandum: Respondent’s counsel was assigned on April 1, 1999 to perfect this appeal from an order of Monroe County Family Court, entered December 4,1998, which denied respondent’s motion to dismiss an order directing respondent to pay child support. Respondent’s counsel has moved to be relieved of the assignment on the ground that there are no non-frivolous issues on the appeal. The record shows that no order of filiation has been entered. Therefore, a non-frivolous issue exists concerning whether the court erred in directing respondent to pay child support in the absence of an order of filiation. We relieve counsel of her assignment but assign new counsel to brief that issue as well as any others that counsel’s review of the record may disclose. (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Taddeo, J. — Support.) Present— Pine, J. P., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ. (Filed May 31, 2000.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case held, decision reserved, motion to relieve counsel of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned. Memorandum: Respondent’s counsel was assigned on April 1, 1999 to perfect this appeal from an order of Monroe County Family Court, entered December 4,1998, which denied respondent’s motion to dismiss an order directing respondent to pay child support. Respondent’s counsel has moved to be relieved of the assignment on the ground that there are no non-frivolous issues on the appeal. The record shows that no order of filiation has been entered. Therefore, a non-frivolous issue exists concerning whether the court erred in directing respondent to pay child support in the absence of an order of filiation. We relieve counsel of her assignment but assign new counsel to brief that issue as well as any others that counsel’s review of the record may disclose. (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Taddeo, J. — Support.) Present— Pine, J. P., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ. (Filed May 31, 2000.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D.2d 947, 711 N.Y.S.2d 368, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glenda-j-v-david-c-nyappdiv-2000.