Glen William Lester v. United States

993 F.2d 883, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18395, 1993 WL 147341
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 7, 1993
Docket92-15850
StatusUnpublished

This text of 993 F.2d 883 (Glen William Lester v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glen William Lester v. United States, 993 F.2d 883, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18395, 1993 WL 147341 (9th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

993 F.2d 883

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Glen William LESTER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 92-15850.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 4, 1993.*
Decided May 7, 1993.

Before GOODWIN, TANG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Glen William Lester appeals the denial of his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. A magistrate judge presided over the selection of the jury that convicted Lester, in violation of Gomez v. United States, 490 U.S. 858 (1989). Lester's conviction became final before Gomez was decided and he now seeks to have the rule in that case applied retroactively. However, we have previously held that Gomez "should not be afforded 'complete' retroactive effect and applied to convictions challenged on collateral review." United States v. Judge, 944 F.2d 523, 525 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1988 (1992). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court denying Lester's motion to vacate sentence is

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously agrees that this case is appropriate for submission without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gomez v. United States
490 U.S. 858 (Supreme Court, 1989)
United States v. Judge
944 F.2d 523 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
993 F.2d 883, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18395, 1993 WL 147341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glen-william-lester-v-united-states-ca9-1993.