Glen Roy Kendall v. William W. May Herbert S. Rosenblum Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner Alan Shachter Norborne P. Beville, Jr.

16 F.3d 410, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7482, 1994 WL 8040
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 14, 1994
Docket93-7057
StatusPublished

This text of 16 F.3d 410 (Glen Roy Kendall v. William W. May Herbert S. Rosenblum Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner Alan Shachter Norborne P. Beville, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glen Roy Kendall v. William W. May Herbert S. Rosenblum Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner Alan Shachter Norborne P. Beville, Jr., 16 F.3d 410, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7482, 1994 WL 8040 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

16 F.3d 410
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Glen Roy KENDALL, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
William W. MAY; Herbert S. Rosenblum; Commonwealth
Transportation Commissioner; Alan Shachter;
Norborne P. Beville, Jr., Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7057.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 1993.
Decided Jan. 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge.

Glen Roy Kendall, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kendall v. May, No. CA-93-602-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 21, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 F.3d 410, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7482, 1994 WL 8040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glen-roy-kendall-v-william-w-may-herbert-s-rosenbl-ca4-1994.