Glen Roy Kendall v. L.M. Saunders Correctional Officer Morris Officer Welther W.C. Hosey Sergeant Santiago

Fourth Circuit

Glen Roy Kendall v. L.M. Saunders Correctional Officer Morris Officer Welther W.C. Hosey Sergeant Santiago

56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19104, 1995 WL 318458

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 1995

Docket95-6168

StatusPublished

This text of 56 F.3d 61 (Glen Roy Kendall v. L.M. Saunders Correctional Officer Morris Officer Welther W.C. Hosey Sergeant Santiago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glen Roy Kendall v. L.M. Saunders Correctional Officer Morris Officer Welther W.C. Hosey Sergeant Santiago, 56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19104, 1995 WL 318458 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

56 F.3d 61
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Glen Roy KENDALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
L.M. SAUNDERS; Correctional Officer Morris; Officer
Welther; W.C. Hosey; Sergeant Santiago,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6168.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 25, 1995.

Glen Roy Kendall, appellant pro se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Lance Bradford Leggitt, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kendall v. Saunders, No. CA-93-551-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

56 F.3d 61
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Glen Roy KENDALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
L.M. SAUNDERS; Correctional Officer Morris; Officer
Welther; W.C. Hosey; Sergeant Santiago,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6168.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 25, 1995.

Glen Roy Kendall, appellant pro se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Lance Bradford Leggitt, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kendall v. Saunders, No. CA-93-551-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19104, 1995 WL 318458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glen-roy-kendall-v-lm-saunders-correctional-office-ca4-1995.