Glen Hyde, Aviation Utilities Services, Inc. and Candace Hyde v. Dianna Nelson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 17, 2020
Docket02-20-00220-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Glen Hyde, Aviation Utilities Services, Inc. and Candace Hyde v. Dianna Nelson (Glen Hyde, Aviation Utilities Services, Inc. and Candace Hyde v. Dianna Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glen Hyde, Aviation Utilities Services, Inc. and Candace Hyde v. Dianna Nelson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00220-CV ___________________________

GLEN HYDE, AVIATION UTILITIES SERVICES, INC., AND CANDACE HYDE, Appellants

V.

DIANNA NELSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 431st District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 19-9622-431

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Womack and Wallach, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants Glen Hyde, Aviation Utilities Services, Inc., and Candace Hyde

attempt to appeal the trial court’s judgment granting Appellee Dianna Nelson’s

motion for summary judgment. The trial court’s judgment was signed on March 10,

2020. Appellants’ notice of appeal was filed in the trial court on July 15, 2020.

Recognizing that their notice of appeal had been filed more than three months late,

Appellants also filed “Appellants’ Motion for Leave to File Late Notice of Appeal” on

July 15, 2020, which this court denied.

On July 24, 2020, and on August 11, 2020, we sent Appellants letters that

informed them about our concern that we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal

because the notice of appeal was not timely. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b), 26.1. We

also informed Appellants that unless they or any party desiring to continue this appeal

filed a response showing grounds for continuing this appeal, it could be dismissed for

want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 42.3(a), 44.3. Appellants did not file a

response.

A timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional. In re United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

307 S.W.3d 299, 307 (Tex. 2010) (orig. proceeding). Because Appellants’ notice of

appeal was untimely, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App.

P. 43.2(f).

2 /s/ Dana Womack

Dana Womack Justice

Delivered: September 17, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re United Services Automobile Ass'n
307 S.W.3d 299 (Texas Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Glen Hyde, Aviation Utilities Services, Inc. and Candace Hyde v. Dianna Nelson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glen-hyde-aviation-utilities-services-inc-and-candace-hyde-v-dianna-texapp-2020.