Glen C. Freeby v. The North Denver Bank

394 F.2d 149, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7054
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 7, 1968·No. 25393·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from a summary judgment rendered in a suit on a promissory note for a liquidated sum. The execution, delivery and validity of the note were not questioned. The defense was payment. Following the completion of discovery proceedings the bank moved for summary judgment on the ground that the note had not been paid.

The memorandum opinion filed by the District Court in connection with the grant of the motion for summary judgment contains a full statement of the issues, facts and law. The record affirmatively discloses that the note had not been paid. The court did not err in granting summary judgment. There was no genuine issue as to any material fact and the bank was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Shahid v. Gulf Power Company, 5 Cir., 1961, 291 F.2d 422, reh. den., 298 F.2d 793 (1962).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glen C. Freeby v. The North Denver Bank, 394 F.2d 149, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7054 (5th Cir. 1968).

394 F.2d 149 (Glen C. Freeby v. The North Denver Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sunbelt Sav., FSB, Dallas, Tex. v. Birch
796 F. Supp. 991 (N.D. Texas, 1992)
Park Club, Inc. v. Resolution Trust Co.
742 F. Supp. 395 (S.D. Texas, 1990)