Glemby Co. v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 335, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1699
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Glemby Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Cust. Ct. 461
United States Customs Court·Decided June 8, 1949·No. No. 53237; petition 6682-R (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

From an examination of the record the court found that, at the time of entry, neither the petitioner nor its broker had knowledge of a higher price for the merchandise than that at which it was entered. When, after entry, and before final appraisement, the broker learned of an advance in price for the goods, he waited for permission from the examiner to amend the entry in [336]*336accordance with the value determined by the examiner, as had been the practice in the past. Inasmuch as the examiner was ill at the time, appraisement was made before the entrant could amend. It was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glemby Co. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 335, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1699 (cusc 1949).

22 Cust. Ct. 335 (Glemby Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.