Gleichauf v. State

334 So. 2d 174, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14616
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 11, 1976
DocketNo. 75-1379
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 334 So. 2d 174 (Gleichauf v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gleichauf v. State, 334 So. 2d 174, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14616 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

BERANEK, JOHN R., Associate Judge.

Defendant appeals from an order revoking his probation. At the revocation hearing defendant was charged with issuing a worthless check. Defendant pleaded not guilty. This hearing for violation of probation was a critical stage of the proceeding against defendant and he was, at the least, entitled to the representation of retained counsel. Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973). Here defendant was effectively denied his right to counsel.

The finding of guilt on the violation of probation and the court’s adjudication of guilt and sentence are reversed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WALDEN, C. J., and ALDERMAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Young
833 P.2d 911 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1992)
Smith v. State
427 So. 2d 773 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Watts v. State
409 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
334 So. 2d 174, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gleichauf-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.