Gleichauf v. State

334 So. 2d 174, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14616
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 11, 1976·No. No. 75-1379·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

BERANEK, JOHN R., Associate Judge.

Defendant appeals from an order revoking his probation. At the revocation hearing defendant was charged with issuing a worthless check. Defendant pleaded not guilty. This hearing for violation of probation was a critical stage of the proceeding against defendant and he was, at the least, entitled to the representation of retained counsel. Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973). Here defendant was effectively denied his right to counsel.

The finding of guilt on the violation of probation and the court’s adjudication of guilt and sentence are reversed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WALDEN, C. J., and ALDERMAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gleichauf v. State, 334 So. 2d 174, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14616 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

334 So. 2d 174 (Gleichauf v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Young
833 P.2d 911 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1992)
Smith v. State
427 So. 2d 773 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Watts v. State
409 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)