Glebocki v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glebocki v. State

273 A.D. 830, 75 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4823

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 1948

DocketClaim No. 27793

StatusPublished

This text of 273 A.D. 830 (Glebocki v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glebocki v. State, 273 A.D. 830, 75 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

) Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing a claim against the State for the alleged wrongful death of claimant’s intestate. The body of the intestate was found during the early morning hours of February 14, 1944, on a bridge maintained by the State which spans the Mohawk River from the city of Cohoes to Waterford. There is strong proof to the effect that the intestate was struck by a motorist who was negligently driving a car that was without adequate lights and in a generally defective condition. The court below found that no act or omission on the part of the State in the construction and maintenance of the bridge contributed to the happening of the accident. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heffeman, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

) Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing a claim against the State for the alleged wrongful death of claimant’s intestate. The body of the intestate was found during the early morning hours of February 14, 1944, on a bridge maintained by the State which spans the Mohawk River from the city of Cohoes to Waterford. There is strong proof to the effect that the intestate was struck by a motorist who was negligently driving a car that was without adequate lights and in a generally defective condition. The court below found that no act or omission on the part of the State in the construction and maintenance of the bridge contributed to the happening of the accident. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heffeman, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D. 830, 75 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glebocki-v-state-nyappdiv-1948.