Gleaton v. Aultman

105 S.E. 445, 150 Ga. 768, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 334
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 18, 1920·No. No. 2002·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Under the pleadings and the evidence the judge oí the superior court did not abuse his discretion in granting an interlocutory injunction. Judgment affirmed.

Sll the Justices concur. Passmore cG Forehand, for plaintiff in error,

cited: Civil Code, § 3666; Guin v. Hilton &c. Co., 6 Ga. App. 487, and cit.; Smith v. Smith, 105 Ga. 111; Woodward v. Gates, 38 Ga. 206; 40 Cyc. 508.

Perry & Williamson, contra,

cited: Civil Code, §§ 3666, 3497, 5493; Gray L. Co. v. Gaskin, 122 Ga. 342; Kollock v. Webb, 113 Ga. 762; Camp v. Dixon, 112 Ga. 872; Brown v. Martin, 137 Ga. 338, and cit.; Trammell v. Johnson, 54 Ga. 340, 344; Griswold v. Greer, 18 Ga. 545; 40 Cyc. 512.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gleaton v. Aultman, 105 S.E. 445, 150 Ga. 768, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 334 (Ga. 1920).

105 S.E. 445 (Gleaton v. Aultman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Turner Turpentine Co.
111 F.2d 400 (Fifth Circuit, 1940)
Butler Naval Stores Co. v. Glass
200 S.E. 286 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Kent v. Lane
147 S.E. 61 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
Lee & Bradshaw v. Rogers
108 S.E. 371 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)