Gleaton v. Aultman
This text of 105 S.E. 445 (Gleaton v. Aultman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the pleadings and the evidence the judge oí the superior court did not abuse his discretion in granting an interlocutory injunction. Judgment affirmed.
cited: Civil Code, § 3666; Guin v. Hilton &c. Co., 6 Ga. App. 487, and cit.; Smith v. Smith, 105 Ga. 111; Woodward v. Gates, 38 Ga. 206; 40 Cyc. 508.
cited: Civil Code, §§ 3666, 3497, 5493; Gray L. Co. v. Gaskin, 122 Ga. 342; Kollock v. Webb, 113 Ga. 762; Camp v. Dixon, 112 Ga. 872; Brown v. Martin, 137 Ga. 338, and cit.; Trammell v. Johnson, 54 Ga. 340, 344; Griswold v. Greer, 18 Ga. 545; 40 Cyc. 512.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 S.E. 445, 150 Ga. 768, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gleaton-v-aultman-ga-1920.