Gleason v. Williams

1 Tapp. Rep. 174

• Court: Stark County Court of Common Pleas
• Decided: August 15, 1817
• Status: Published

Opinion

President.

When a man comes into a court of justice as a witness, he is not supposed to come prepared to explain and defend every transaction of his life; but he is supposed to come prepared to sustain a general good character; hence, you shall not be permitted to give evidence of particular facts and circumstances to impeach his credit, but must confine your enquiries to that general character he is supposed prepared to defend; but th'e grounds and reasons on which a witness founds his opinion of the bad character of another, may be enquired into in support of the character attempted to be impeached, to shew whether his statement is the result of prejudice or candid observation; whether, in truth, he states what is the general character, or only his distorted view of it. So, in defence 'of the character of a witness, particular facts may be gone into. Unless this latitude of examination were permitted, it would be dangerous for any man who had personal or party enemies, to appear as a witness, and courts and juries might be easily deceived to discredit the testimony of men whose real characters were irreproachable. The objection cannot prevail.