Gleason v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gleason v. State

259 So. 3d 893

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 12, 2018

DocketNo. 4D17-1175

StatusPublished

This text of 259 So. 3d 893 (Gleason v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gleason v. State, 259 So. 3d 893 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Raymond Gleason appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary of a dwelling and dealing in stolen property. We affirm on all issues raised by appellant, except we reverse and remand for a nunc pro tunc competency hearing. As the State concedes, the trial court failed to hold a competency hearing and make an independent determination of competency before trial. See Silver v. State , 193 So.3d 991, 994 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded.

Taylor, Ciklin and Conner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Raymond Gleason appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary of a dwelling and dealing in stolen property. We affirm on all issues raised by appellant, except we reverse and remand for a nunc pro tunc competency hearing. As the State concedes, the trial court failed to hold a competency hearing and make an independent determination of competency before trial. See Silver v. State , 193 So.3d 991, 994 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded.

Taylor, Ciklin and Conner, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 So. 3d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gleason-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack