Gleason v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gleason v. State

259 So. 3d 893

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 2018·No. No. 4D17-1175·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Raymond Gleason appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary of a dwelling and dealing in stolen property. We affirm on all issues raised by appellant, except we reverse and remand for a nunc pro tunc competency hearing. As the State concedes, the trial court failed to hold a competency hearing and make an independent determination of competency before trial. See Silver v. State , 193 So.3d 991, 994 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded.

Taylor, Ciklin and Conner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Raymond Gleason appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary of a dwelling and dealing in stolen property. We affirm on all issues raised by appellant, except we reverse and remand for a nunc pro tunc competency hearing. As the State concedes, the trial court failed to hold a competency hearing and make an independent determination of competency before trial. See Silver v. State , 193 So.3d 991, 994 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded.

Taylor, Ciklin and Conner, JJ., concur.

Gleason v. State, 259 So. 3d 893 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

259 So. 3d 893 (Gleason v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related