Gleason v. James Cunningham, Son & Co.
121 A.D. 893, 105 N.Y.S. 1117
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1907
StatusPublished
This text of 121 A.D. 893 (Gleason v. James Cunningham, Son & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gleason v. James Cunningham, Son & Co., 121 A.D. 893, 105 N.Y.S. 1117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).
Opinion
Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to the defendant to plead over upon payment of the costs of the demurrer and of this appeal. Held, that the complaint is so comprehensive that a cause of action is alleged against both defendants. All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
121 A.D. 893, 105 N.Y.S. 1117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gleason-v-james-cunningham-son-co-nyappdiv-1907.