Gleason v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gleason v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

115 A.D. 896

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D. 896 (Gleason v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gleason v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad, 115 A.D. 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment "and order affirmed, with costs. All Concurred, excépt Kruse, J., who dissented upon the ground-that the movement of the light engine by whistle signals only, which the court charged Was safe and proper practice, was no evidence tending to prove that the unsafe and improper practice of moving engines with cars attached-by ivhistle signals-only without the hand, flag or lamp signals, and it "was error to permit to it" for that

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment "and order affirmed, with costs. All Concurred, excépt Kruse, J., who dissented upon the ground-that the movement of the light engine by whistle signals only, which the court charged Was safe and proper practice, was no evidence tending to prove that the unsafe and improper practice of moving engines with cars attached-by ivhistle signals-only without the hand, flag or lamp signals, and it "was error to permit to it" for that

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D. 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gleason-v-delaware-lackawanna-western-railroad-nyappdiv-1906.