Gleason v. Congdon

New York Supreme Court

Gleason v. Congdon

28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 106

DecidedApril 15, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 106 (Gleason v. Congdon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gleason v. Congdon, 28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 106 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered in Monroe Oounty Oourt, costs to abide event. Held (1), that the mortgage having been drawn by plaintiff’s agent in form to be executed by Patrick Donnelly as well as his wife, and it being for the benefit of the plaintiff, his acceptance of it is to be implied from the circumstances, there being no reason to question the good faith of the transaction. (2.) That the mortgage not having become due, and the property being in the possession of the mortgagor, the mortgagor had a leviable interest, which the defendant was justified in selling. (42 N. Y., 325.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered in Monroe Oounty Oourt, costs to abide event. Held (1), that the mortgage having been drawn by plaintiff’s agent in form to be executed by Patrick Donnelly as well as his wife, and it being for the benefit of the plaintiff, his acceptance of it is to be implied from the circumstances, there being no reason to question the good faith of the transaction. (2.) That the mortgage not having become due, and the property being in the possession of the mortgagor, the mortgagor had a leviable interest, which the defendant was justified in selling. (42 N. Y., 325.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gleason-v-congdon-nysupct-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack